2 Comments

As a former member of the WCI I am horrified by their pandering to these men.

But thanks for confirming the number of times men are mentioned in the constitution (saves me a job today). If I happen upon Leo, Roderic or Jack tomorrow (all my local TDs), I’ll make sure to query why these references have been ignored in the quest to make the constitution gender neutral.

#votenono

Expand full comment

"The text actually makes it possible to make the case that a woman’s duties to her kids are more important to society than working (hard to argue with that)."

The real beef is that this prevents rich people from making more money.

Expand full comment