Jennifer Bilek, who posts here frequently, has documented how well-oiled trans machine is, @ least 1 trans BILLIONAIRE & we're learning how much they & their 💵 can cause! Helen Joyce falsely accused of antisemitism because 2 sponsors she named are Jewish, social contagion spreads in ALL directions, female prisoners being assaulted & impregnated in multiple countries by self-identifying mtf trans sex crime convicts, apparently bathrooms & change rooms insufficient. Heretic Andrew Gold has excellent interview with young survivor whose rapist father was released early (without her knowledge) after announcing he was a she.
The agenda persists with unlimited funding and support because it’s top down (not grass roots). The goal is the erasure of gender for the transhumanist age where everyone will be a genderless cyborg (oh joy).
It started with feminism (which was also funded and steered by the ruling class). That’s why feminists could always get away with such anti social behaviour as long as they promoted the agenda. Now trans identified people can also get away with anti social behaviour as long as they promote the latest stage of the agenda too.
Feminism has gone about as far as it can with respect to destroying gender roles, gender identity, the family, childhood, parenting, motherhood, fatherhood etc. Feminists who are not on board with medicalisation, hormones and self ID are now being thrown off the bus.
In a couple of decades when ‘trans’ has taken society as far as it can towards a genderless utopia (genderless passports, birth certificates, non binary identities, unisex spaces, genderless bodies etc) trans people will also be discarded. Those who identify as trans men and trans women will become the new social outcasts, because even the concept of men and women will become outdated. The only acceptable identity will be non binary, fluid, free, unisex, asexual, infertile, barren, nothing.
Anything related to ‘male’ or ‘female’ will be considered outdated far right tradcon social deviancy … just as feminists have always viewed stay at home mothers as outdated far right tradcon deviants with internalised misogyny.
This is the aim of the transhumanists: keep moving the Overton window until biological life is replaced with synthetic technology.
It did not start in 2014. It started a century ago with feminism and feminism’s ‘social construct’ (blank slate) theory of gender.
Only by dismantling feminism and reconciling male and female, can we end feminism’s ‘battle of the sexes’ and avert a transhumanist future.
New technologies for creating genetically related children could transform family life, giving same-sex couples and infertile women more options for parenthood.
By Amy Dockser Marcus Oct. 27, 2023
Baby born using ovarian Cells outside women's body
Yes agreed. And also the extinction of males too. Male testosterone is already plummeting, with 20 year olds how having the T levels of old men. And fathers have been branded useless, toxic, pointless and a bad influence by feminists for decades. Thanks to policies demanded by feminists fathers have been driven out of the family home, out of the live of their own children and to the very fringes of society.
The education system has also been stripped of male teachers who have been replaced by radical feminists with they/ them pronouns teaching gender ideology to the children.
Both of these feminist policies ensure that children and young people today often have no male role models and teacher in their lives. Instead they are told by feminist women that men are toxic, oppressive and rapey - a false accusation which causes many young women to adopt a trans/ NB identity to avoid being targeted as a female, and many young men to adopt a trans/ NB identity to avoid becoming the toxic monster (or 'caveman') that feminism insists all men are.
The mantra for at least the last 50 years has been "The future is female" and "women don't need no man" but the same women who have kicked ordinary men in the balls do not hesitate to run to daddy government and UN Women when they want a man to help them. This ensures only the most psychopathic, power hungry, violent men in society (the elite technocratic class) have any influence on women. And of course they are all signed up to the transhumanist agenda.
The millions of ordinary hard working men who actually care about women and children have already been kicked in the balls and relegated to the sidelines by modern women.
The only group of men feminists have consistently formed an alliance with is homosexual men, who obviously have an incentive to promote surrogacy, and eventually 'artificial womb' technology.
B.S. Matt Krisiloff explicitly states and is literally in the process of manufacturing human eggs because, as he says, "in case one of the sexes becomes extinct." Guess which sex produces eggs.since men commit 97 % of violent crimes and the majority of people killed in wars for over the last half century are non-combatant women and children, I think we know who's going to exterminate the sex who produces the eggs. It will be the men who blame women for every ill in society from low testosterone to family's instability. The women-haters can never resist showing their true colors.
We can also note that male sperm counts are dropping like a stone and the average young man today has the testosterone levels of a 60 year old a few generations ago.
Mice place under a cell tower become sterile and die out after about 5 generations. Men with cell phones in their pockets cause quantifiable (and long lasting) sperm damage after an hour.
All of this is known. The attack on fertility is deliberate and is directed at BOTH sexes.
The erasure of women began with the feminism movement, which denies women even exist as moral agents. So by blaming everything on men, denying women play any role in steering culture and society, and removing all accountability from women you are only helping to erase women from existence.
If feminism is true then eradicating women will make no difference to anything, given that feminism claims women have no social power, and have never played an active role in society.
" men commit 97 % of violent crimes"
Not when you include abortion and spanking (hitting children is absolutely domestic violence).
Not when you include violence by proxy (false claims of DV, false claims of rape, false claims of assault, relying on government (men with guns) to extract resources from men or control men in some other way).
" It will be the men who blame women for every ill in society"
There exists no movement equivalent to feminism and its 'patriarchy theory' which blames men for all social ills throughout history, and has done so for the last 150 years.
"The women-haters can never resist showing their true colors."
The claim that society hates women is a false accusation against men. It is also an act of female erasure, given that it defines 'society' as male.
Men and women are each other's greatest allies, and always have been. The threat comes from a small cult of 'elite' transhumanists, technocrats and social engineers. Feminism is one of their most deadly weapons because it exploits female neuroticism and vanity to divide the sexes (divide and conquer).
You know that nobody hear believes you, right? We've worked in the fields of male violence against women. We know perfectly well what men do to women and girls and how little of it even gets reported, much less prosecuted, much less successfully. Even then, the men are incarcerated for a few years, then released to prey on women and girls again. And now the transgenderist lobby is being even more helpful--they're locking those men IN with women for them to prey on.
Transgenderism is a male supremacy lobby. All. The. Way.
If you don't like being controlled by other men, you'd better do something about it. Male-on-male issues are NOT women's fault.
It seems like most of the perpetrators will continue to evade any penalty for their cruel sexual and physical abuse of small, helpless children. Most of the perpetrators are men, not just by the words of the victims, but also by studies, statistics that 97% of violent crimes are committed by men. So minus males you might lower the incidence of predatory behavior by 97%? Yet there's a constant drum beat that more male teachers are needed as role models for young children in primary education. So women can't be good examples for children? We've known for centuries why males predominate in higher education and women in primary schools. #1. There is a wide variance in pay. Not many men would be satisfied with the wages nursery or primary teachers get. #2. In the past, because of high rates of physical and sexual abuse of young students male teachers were eschewed. It was thought that older students could better protect themselves from predatory teachers. Why not, as a balance between exorbitant monetary payouts, also actually prosecute the perpetrators. Why aren't the victims given the satisfaction of seeing their tormentors being punished by being criminalized and jailed? In many cases, I think the victims would consider it as rewarding receiving money. Why are the perpetrators protected from prosecution? I guess we all know the answer to that.
Right now the War On Russia is the EU's top priority, and anything that distracts from that war and getting the US to deepen its involvment is pushed aside.
shocking, shocking, shocking
Wake up, European voters!
Jennifer Bilek, who posts here frequently, has documented how well-oiled trans machine is, @ least 1 trans BILLIONAIRE & we're learning how much they & their 💵 can cause! Helen Joyce falsely accused of antisemitism because 2 sponsors she named are Jewish, social contagion spreads in ALL directions, female prisoners being assaulted & impregnated in multiple countries by self-identifying mtf trans sex crime convicts, apparently bathrooms & change rooms insufficient. Heretic Andrew Gold has excellent interview with young survivor whose rapist father was released early (without her knowledge) after announcing he was a she.
Isn't ILGA the group that sponsored the pedophiles group back in the Nineties?
https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1994/01/27/senate-to-u-n-drop-pedophilia-groups/
The agenda persists with unlimited funding and support because it’s top down (not grass roots). The goal is the erasure of gender for the transhumanist age where everyone will be a genderless cyborg (oh joy).
It started with feminism (which was also funded and steered by the ruling class). That’s why feminists could always get away with such anti social behaviour as long as they promoted the agenda. Now trans identified people can also get away with anti social behaviour as long as they promote the latest stage of the agenda too.
Feminism has gone about as far as it can with respect to destroying gender roles, gender identity, the family, childhood, parenting, motherhood, fatherhood etc. Feminists who are not on board with medicalisation, hormones and self ID are now being thrown off the bus.
In a couple of decades when ‘trans’ has taken society as far as it can towards a genderless utopia (genderless passports, birth certificates, non binary identities, unisex spaces, genderless bodies etc) trans people will also be discarded. Those who identify as trans men and trans women will become the new social outcasts, because even the concept of men and women will become outdated. The only acceptable identity will be non binary, fluid, free, unisex, asexual, infertile, barren, nothing.
Anything related to ‘male’ or ‘female’ will be considered outdated far right tradcon social deviancy … just as feminists have always viewed stay at home mothers as outdated far right tradcon deviants with internalised misogyny.
This is the aim of the transhumanists: keep moving the Overton window until biological life is replaced with synthetic technology.
It did not start in 2014. It started a century ago with feminism and feminism’s ‘social construct’ (blank slate) theory of gender.
Only by dismantling feminism and reconciling male and female, can we end feminism’s ‘battle of the sexes’ and avert a transhumanist future.
No, anonymous cave man
It's about the extinction of human females: read and learn:
Rob Stein NPR tries to make Matt Krisiloff say he wants to help women. NO, he doesn't
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/07/15/1184298351/conception-human-eggs-ivg-ivf-infertility
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/12/1187368587/biomedical-startups-are-racing-to-revolutionize-the-way-humans-reproduce
Conception Matt Krisiloff & Rob Stein NPR
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/07/15/1184298351/conception-human-eggs-ivg-ivf-infertility
Wall Street Journal The Saturday Essay
What If Men Could Make Their Own Egg Cells?
New technologies for creating genetically related children could transform family life, giving same-sex couples and infertile women more options for parenthood.
By Amy Dockser Marcus Oct. 27, 2023
Baby born using ovarian Cells outside women's body
https://www.insideprecisionmedicine.com/topics/patient-care/first-baby-born-using-technology-that-matures-eggs-outside-the-body/
Geoffery Hinton, Father of AI
https://youtube.com/watch?v=b_DUft-BdIE&si=cArsnkOSj-ftscCz
Rabbit has a mad that men don't have 100% control over all girls and women.
Sounds like a transgenderist to me.
"It's about the extinction of human females"
Yes agreed. And also the extinction of males too. Male testosterone is already plummeting, with 20 year olds how having the T levels of old men. And fathers have been branded useless, toxic, pointless and a bad influence by feminists for decades. Thanks to policies demanded by feminists fathers have been driven out of the family home, out of the live of their own children and to the very fringes of society.
The education system has also been stripped of male teachers who have been replaced by radical feminists with they/ them pronouns teaching gender ideology to the children.
Both of these feminist policies ensure that children and young people today often have no male role models and teacher in their lives. Instead they are told by feminist women that men are toxic, oppressive and rapey - a false accusation which causes many young women to adopt a trans/ NB identity to avoid being targeted as a female, and many young men to adopt a trans/ NB identity to avoid becoming the toxic monster (or 'caveman') that feminism insists all men are.
The mantra for at least the last 50 years has been "The future is female" and "women don't need no man" but the same women who have kicked ordinary men in the balls do not hesitate to run to daddy government and UN Women when they want a man to help them. This ensures only the most psychopathic, power hungry, violent men in society (the elite technocratic class) have any influence on women. And of course they are all signed up to the transhumanist agenda.
The millions of ordinary hard working men who actually care about women and children have already been kicked in the balls and relegated to the sidelines by modern women.
The only group of men feminists have consistently formed an alliance with is homosexual men, who obviously have an incentive to promote surrogacy, and eventually 'artificial womb' technology.
B.S. Matt Krisiloff explicitly states and is literally in the process of manufacturing human eggs because, as he says, "in case one of the sexes becomes extinct." Guess which sex produces eggs.since men commit 97 % of violent crimes and the majority of people killed in wars for over the last half century are non-combatant women and children, I think we know who's going to exterminate the sex who produces the eggs. It will be the men who blame women for every ill in society from low testosterone to family's instability. The women-haters can never resist showing their true colors.
We can also note that male sperm counts are dropping like a stone and the average young man today has the testosterone levels of a 60 year old a few generations ago.
Mice place under a cell tower become sterile and die out after about 5 generations. Men with cell phones in their pockets cause quantifiable (and long lasting) sperm damage after an hour.
All of this is known. The attack on fertility is deliberate and is directed at BOTH sexes.
The erasure of women began with the feminism movement, which denies women even exist as moral agents. So by blaming everything on men, denying women play any role in steering culture and society, and removing all accountability from women you are only helping to erase women from existence.
If feminism is true then eradicating women will make no difference to anything, given that feminism claims women have no social power, and have never played an active role in society.
" men commit 97 % of violent crimes"
Not when you include abortion and spanking (hitting children is absolutely domestic violence).
Not when you include violence by proxy (false claims of DV, false claims of rape, false claims of assault, relying on government (men with guns) to extract resources from men or control men in some other way).
" It will be the men who blame women for every ill in society"
There exists no movement equivalent to feminism and its 'patriarchy theory' which blames men for all social ills throughout history, and has done so for the last 150 years.
"The women-haters can never resist showing their true colors."
The claim that society hates women is a false accusation against men. It is also an act of female erasure, given that it defines 'society' as male.
Men and women are each other's greatest allies, and always have been. The threat comes from a small cult of 'elite' transhumanists, technocrats and social engineers. Feminism is one of their most deadly weapons because it exploits female neuroticism and vanity to divide the sexes (divide and conquer).
"false claims"
You know that nobody hear believes you, right? We've worked in the fields of male violence against women. We know perfectly well what men do to women and girls and how little of it even gets reported, much less prosecuted, much less successfully. Even then, the men are incarcerated for a few years, then released to prey on women and girls again. And now the transgenderist lobby is being even more helpful--they're locking those men IN with women for them to prey on.
Transgenderism is a male supremacy lobby. All. The. Way.
If you don't like being controlled by other men, you'd better do something about it. Male-on-male issues are NOT women's fault.
It seems like most of the perpetrators will continue to evade any penalty for their cruel sexual and physical abuse of small, helpless children. Most of the perpetrators are men, not just by the words of the victims, but also by studies, statistics that 97% of violent crimes are committed by men. So minus males you might lower the incidence of predatory behavior by 97%? Yet there's a constant drum beat that more male teachers are needed as role models for young children in primary education. So women can't be good examples for children? We've known for centuries why males predominate in higher education and women in primary schools. #1. There is a wide variance in pay. Not many men would be satisfied with the wages nursery or primary teachers get. #2. In the past, because of high rates of physical and sexual abuse of young students male teachers were eschewed. It was thought that older students could better protect themselves from predatory teachers. Why not, as a balance between exorbitant monetary payouts, also actually prosecute the perpetrators. Why aren't the victims given the satisfaction of seeing their tormentors being punished by being criminalized and jailed? In many cases, I think the victims would consider it as rewarding receiving money. Why are the perpetrators protected from prosecution? I guess we all know the answer to that.
So men are trying to kill off the human race, and this is women's fault how?
Oh, that's right:
Rule #1 of Misogyny
Everything men do is women's fault.
Right now the War On Russia is the EU's top priority, and anything that distracts from that war and getting the US to deepen its involvment is pushed aside.
💩4🧠
It's such a slick operation.
Live & let live is one thing , but this....